Now for more on the DUMB STICK theory of plot-breaking…
When drafting or outlining a book, there’s this false idea that a) it’s all common sense or b) it’s purely intellectual.
The exercise of breaking plot, like Melinda Snodgrass described from her Star Trek screen-writing days, is a challenge to that. It also challenges the idea that the writer’s own ideas are sacred. But I’ll let you wrestle with that on your own…
Essentially, you start with the premise that Three-Act Structure is a working formula, and your book can use it for a little better focus.
In the breaks where we got together to play around with this, we kicked off by having the subject (willing subject, I might add) start telling us about their book. Being writers who also design worlds, create characters, think up twists, we would interrupt constantly with questions and commentary. Sometimes more one than the other.
As we tried to fit the story into a structure, sometimes problems became apparent–at least to those trying to “help”.
The main thing brought to this version of workshopping, though, was the willingness of disinterested parties to throw out stupid ideas. To claim the Stick of Dumb, and announce an idea that the actual writer might be horrified by…and then inspired, too.
Shaking loose inspiration can be hard. Having a room full of enthusiastic writers with no reason to fear YOUR failure to throw things out there can be really powerful.